4 merge requests!12First publish without edit,!7Add: Abstract and Introduction,!5Master-1 : change the Abstract,!4Draft: Review Branch with all changes from main against empty
Comparing different image processing libraries is an important job that has to be done to find a solution which is on the one hand cost-effective and on the other hand high-performing that would be appropriate for the industrial and software applications. Automation, quality control, medical imaging, and real-time data analysis are the use cases involving digital image processing, and it requires the libraries that can give both efficiency and elasticity. Whether they are open-source or proprietary, the libraries such as OpenCV, SkiaSharp, Magick.NET, Emgu CV, and OpenCvSharp give a wide spectrum of functionalities, from simple image manipulations to complex computer vision problems.\\
The choice of a graphics programming library that is applicable to a given task is primarily influenced by several factors (the first of which is) the computational efficiency used in the algorithms, as well as licensing, and integration concepts as well. Some libraries take into account the speed and flexibility and thus cater to performance-critical applications whereas others are more centered on the ease of use and support for different platforms. To test the performance of libraries, you will be needed to measure their run-time, memory usage, and requirements for different environments, including embedded systems, desktop applications, and cloud-based platforms.\\
A key consideration in the industrial context is the trade-off between the processing power and the stability in the setting of the operation. On the one hand, with the help of the high-performance computers, the image transformation can be done in a flash and the real-time analysis can be done but, on the other hand, embedded systems and industrial controllers always set limits that make the execution slow. It is crucial to make the necessary trade-offs between these three in the case of such companies, which approach the issue of image processing optimization by factoring in reliability and cost efficiency.\\
Comparing different image processing libraries is an important job that has to be done to find a solution which is on the one hand cost-effective and on the other hand high-performing that would be appropriate for the industrial and software applications. Automation, quality control, medical imaging, and real-time data analysis are the use cases involving digital image processing, and it requires the libraries that can give both efficiency and elasticity. Whether they are open-source or proprietary, the libraries such as OpenCV, SkiaSharp, Magick.NET, Emgu CV, and OpenCvSharp give a wide spectrum of functionalities, from simple image manipulations to complex computer vision problems.
The choice of a graphics programming library that is applicable to a given task is primarily influenced by several factors (the first of which is) the computational efficiency used in the algorithms, as well as licensing, and integration concepts as well. Some libraries take into account the speed and flexibility and thus cater to performance-critical applications whereas others are more centered on the ease of use and support for different platforms. To test the performance of libraries, you will be needed to measure their run-time, memory usage, and requirements for different environments, including embedded systems, desktop applications, and cloud-based platforms.
A key consideration in the industrial context is the trade-off between the processing power and the stability in the setting of the operation. On the one hand, with the help of the high-performance computers, the image transformation can be done in a flash and the real-time analysis can be done but, on the other hand, embedded systems and industrial controllers always set limits that make the execution slow. It is crucial to make the necessary trade-offs between these three in the case of such companies, which approach the issue of image processing optimization by factoring in reliability and cost efficiency.
The research report is a comprehensive analysis of the image processing libraries. During the course of the project, the main strengths, weaknesses, as well as the best-use scenarios are seen. The results compile efficiency measurements, integration difficulties, and cost-related issues, offering a practical guide not only for software developers but also for hardware engineers and decision-makers who would like to principally survive the expanding market of image processing solutions in any type of industry across the world.
